{"product_id":"4589538803186","title":"Bruckner (1824-1896) - Symphony No.2 -1877 Version : Markus Poschner \/ Linz Bruckner Orchestra - Import CD","description":"\u003cp\u003eCredits:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eBruckner (1824-1896)\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eDescription:\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis is the ninth release of #bruckner2024, an initiative by the CAPRICCIO label and the International Bruckner Society to record all Bruckner symphonies in their entirety by 2024, the 200th anniversary of Bruckner's birth. This recording of the Hawkshaw version of Bruckner's 2nd Symphony sheds new light on the controversial 2nd draft of the 2nd Symphony. Paul Hawkshaw, the editor of #bruckner2024 and the reviser of the score used in this CD (NBG III\/1: 2\/2 in preparation for publication), summarizes the history of No. 2 in his commentary on the original recording: \"The composition began in 1871 and was completed in September of the following year, 72. On October 26, 1873, the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, under the direction of Otto Dessoff, gave the first performance of No. 2, and on February 20, 1876, the Philharmonic gave a second performance with the same cast.The second manuscript was published by Albert J. Gutmann in Vienna in 1892, revised by Bruckner's pupil Cyril Hünais (Zyril Hünais), followed by the Haas edition in 1934, the Novak edition in 1965, and the Callaghan edition in 2007. The Haas edition and the Novak edition were published in 1934, 1965, and 2007, respectively. It has been pointed out that the Haas and Novak editions are based on the second manuscript (1877) but contain the first manuscript (1872), and the Callaghan edition is considered to have removed the elements of the 1872 manuscript. Barenboim \u0026amp; Staatskapelle Berlin and Thielemann \u0026amp; Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra have adopted this version, and it is internationally recognized. The Carragán version incorporates parts of the 1892 manuscript with annotations, so the Hawkshaw version is the closest to the 1877 manuscript without those parts.With regard to the 1892 manuscript, the question arises as to whether or not the work of the reviser Hünaith was approved by Bruckner himself, and whether the revisions were based on the composer's own intentions or whether they were tampered with by his disciples. Callaghan thinks that Bruckner's will was reflected (to a certain extent or more), while Hawkshaw seems to be in denial. The specifics of Hawkshaw's work await the publication of \"NBG III\/1: 2\/2,\" but many fans will be interested to hear the recording ahead of time. Poschner's playing is very Beethovenian in its approach, with tight tempos and crisp shapes, but the gentle expression of the second movement and its spacious tempo make it a pleasure to listen to Bruckner's slow movement.(Reference data)Performance time comparison Poschner\/Hawkshaw version (16:15\/13:57\/6:18\/15:12=51:47) Barenboim\/Callaghan version (17:23\/13:03\/7:51\/16:02=54:19) Naxos Japan\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Capriccio","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46734548238625,"sku":"4589538803186","price":17.95,"currency_code":"EUR","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0568\/8482\/2076\/files\/4589538803186.jpg?v=1693924710","url":"https:\/\/cdsvinyljapan.com\/en-be\/products\/4589538803186","provider":"CDs Vinyl Japan Store","version":"1.0","type":"link"}